
Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms
Author(s) -
Camilus K. Santle,
Govindan V. K.,
Sathidevi P.S.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1120/jacmp.v12i3.3285
Subject(s) - pectoral muscle , hausdorff distance , preprocessor , computer science , ground truth , transformation (genetics) , watershed , pattern recognition (psychology) , artificial intelligence , computer vision , mathematics , anatomy , medicine , biology , biochemistry , gene
In most of the approaches of computer‐aided detection of breast cancer, one of the preprocessing steps applied to the mammogram is the removal/suppression of pectoral muscle, as its presence within the mammogram may adversely affect the outcome of cancer detection processes. Through this study, we propose an efficient automatic method using the watershed transformation for identifying the pectoral muscle in mediolateral oblique view mammograms. The watershed transformation of the mammogram shows interesting properties that include the appearance of a unique watershed line corresponding to the pectoral muscle edge. In addition to this, it is observed that the pectoral muscle region is oversegmented due to the existence of several catchment basins within the pectoral muscle. Hence, a suitable merging algorithm is proposed to combine the appropriate catchment basins to obtain the correct pectoral muscle region. A total of 84 mammograms from the mammographic image analysis database were used to validate this approach. The mean false positive and mean false negative rates, obtained by comparing the results of the proposed approach with manually‐identified (ground truth) pectoral muscle boundaries, respectively, were 0.85% and 4.88%. A comparison of the results of the proposed method with related state‐of‐the‐art methods shows that the performance of the proposed approach is better than the existing methods in terms of the mean false negative rate. Using Hausdorff distance metric, the comparison of the results of the proposed method with ground truth shows low Hausdorff distances, the mean and standard deviation being 3.85 ± 1.07 mm . PACS numbers: 87.57.R, 87.57.nm, 87.59.ej, 87.85.Ng, 87.85.Pq