Open AccessProviding solid angle formalism for skyshine calculations
Author(s) -
Gossman Michael S.,
Pahikkala A. Jussi,
Rising Mary B.,
McGinley Patton H.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of applied clinical medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.83
H-Index - 48
ISSN - 1526-9914
DOI - 10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3286
Subject(s) - solid angle , formalism (music) , conical surface , physics , field size , nuclear medicine , square (algebra) , computational physics , medical physics , optics , mathematics , beam (structure) , medicine , geometry , art , musical , detector , visual arts
We detail, derive and correct the technical use of the solid angle variable identified in formal guidance that relates skyshine calculations to dose‐equivalent rate. We further recommend it for use with all National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) and similar reports documented. In general, for beams of identical width which have different resulting areas, within ± 1.0 % maximum deviation the analytical pyramidal solution is 1.27 times greater than a misapplied analytical conical solution through all field sizes up to 40 × 40 c m 2 . Therefore, we recommend determining the exact results with the analytical pyramidal solution for square beams and the analytical conical solution for circular beams. PACS number(s): 87.52.‐g, 87.52.Df, 87.52.Tr, 87.53.‐j, 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Dq, 87.66.‐a, 89., 89.60.+x