z-logo
Premium
Experimental verification of a CT‐based Monte Carlo dose‐calculation method in heterogeneous phantoms
Author(s) -
Wang Lu,
Lovelock Michael,
Chui ChenShou
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.598802
Subject(s) - monte carlo method , imaging phantom , dosimeter , dosimetry , thermoluminescent dosimeter , nuclear medicine , hounsfield scale , materials science , dose profile , computational physics , physics , computed tomography , mathematics , medicine , radiology , statistics
To further validate the Monte Carlo dose‐calculation method [Med. Phys. 25 , 867–878 (1998)] developed at the Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center, we have performed experimental verification in various inhomogeneous phantoms. The phantom geometries included simple layered slabs, a simulated bone column, a simulated missing‐tissue hemisphere, and an anthropomorphic head geometry (Alderson Rando Phantom). The densities of the inhomogeneity range from 0.14 to 1.86 g/cm 3 , simulating both clinically relevant lunglike and bonelike materials. The data are reported as central axis depth doses, dose profiles, dose values at points of interest, such as points at the interface of two different media and in the “nasopharynx” region of the Rando head. The dosimeters used in the measurement included dosimetry film, TLD chips, and rods. The measured data were compared to that of Monte Carlo calculations for the same geometrical configurations. In the case of the Rando head phantom, a CT scan of the phantom was used to define the calculation geometry and to locate the points of interest. The agreement between the calculation and measurement is generally within 2.5%. This work validates the accuracy of the Monte Carlo method. While Monte Carlo, at present, is still too slow for routine treatment planning, it can be used as a benchmark against which other dose calculation methods can be compared.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here