Premium
A Monte Carlo comparison of the response of the PTW‐diamond and the TL‐diamond detectors in megavoltage photon beams
Author(s) -
Mobit Paul N.,
Sandison George A.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.598771
Subject(s) - dosimeter , imaging phantom , diamond , monte carlo method , detector , dosimetry , photon , physics , optics , absorbed dose , gamma ray , materials science , dose profile , nuclear medicine , radiation , nuclear physics , medicine , statistics , mathematics , composite material
A detailed Monte Carlo study of the PTW‐diamond solid state detector response in megavoltage photon beams ( 60 Co γ rays to 25 MV x rays) has been performed with the EGS4 Monte Carlo Code. The sensitive volume of the diamond detector is a disk of diameter 4.4 mm and thickness 0.40 mm. The phantom material was water and the irradiation depth was usually 3 cm but additional simulations were performed at six other depths for the 10 and 25 MV x rays. Results show that the PTW‐diamond detector response per unit of absorbed dose is constant within 1% for photon beam energies ranging from60 Co γ rays to 25 MV x rays. Accurate depth dose curves for 10 and 25 MV x‐ray beams may be measured with the diamond detector since the response per unit of absorbed dose at different depths in a water phantom is also constant to within 1% for depths ranging from 3 to 25 cm and field sizes ranging from 2.5 cm by 2.5 cm to 10 cm by 10 cm. An examination of the difference between the PTW‐diamond detector and the wall‐less form of the detector (e.g., TLDs) revealed that there is no significant difference in their response in megavoltage photon beams. This implies that the encapsulation of the diamond dosimeter causes less than a 1.3% change in its response for these megavoltage photon beams. Analysis of the total dose deposited in the sensitive volume of the detector shows that the PTW‐diamond detector behaves as an intermediate‐sized cavity, not a simple Bragg–Gray cavity, since the dose contribution from photon interactions within the cavity( α c ) to the total cavity dose is 8% for 25 MV x rays and increases to 42% for60 Co γ rays.