z-logo
Premium
A CT‐based Monte Carlo simulation tool for dosimetry planning and analysis
Author(s) -
DeMarco J. J.,
Solberg T. D.,
Smathers J. B.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.598167
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , monte carlo method , dosimetry , voxel , radiation treatment planning , computer science , computational physics , computational science , nuclear medicine , simulation , medical physics , physics , optics , mathematics , statistics , radiation therapy , artificial intelligence , radiology , medicine
The Los Alamos code MCNP4A (M_onte C_arlo N_‐P_article version 4A) is currently used to simulate a variety of problems ranging from nuclear reactor analysis to boron neutron capture therapy. A graphical user interface has been developed that automatically sets up the MCNP4A geometry and radiation source requirements for a three‐dimensional Monte Carlo simulation using computed tomography data. The major drawback for this dosimetry system is the amount of time to obtain a statistically significant answer. A specialized patch file has been developed that optimizes photon particle transport and dose scoring within the standard MCNP4A lattice geometry. The transport modifications produce a performance increase (number of histories per minute) of approximately 4.7 based upon a 6 MV point source centered within a 30 × 30 × 30   cm 3lattice water phantom and 1 × 1 × 1   mm 3voxels. The dose scoring modifications produce a performance increase of approximately 470 based upon a tally section of greater than1 × 10 4lattice elements and a voxel size of 5   mm 3 . Homogeneous and heterogeneous benchmark calculations produce good agreement with measurements using a standard water phantom and a high‐ and low‐density heterogeneity phantom. The dose distribution from a typical mediastinum treatment planning setup is presented for qualitative analysis and comparison versus a conventional treatment planning system.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom