z-logo
Premium
Multifractal radiographic analysis of osteoporosis
Author(s) -
Caligiuri Philip,
Giger Maryellen L.,
Favus Murray
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.597390
Subject(s) - osteoporosis , radiography , medicine , multifractal system , receiver operating characteristic , fractal dimension , fractal analysis , fracture (geology) , bone mineral , radiology , bone mass , fractal , bone density , orthodontics , dentistry , nuclear medicine , mathematics , materials science , mathematical analysis , composite material
An important complication of osteoporosis is fracture. Alteration in bone structure, as well as decreased bone mass, contribute to the tendency to fracture in osteoporosis. Current methods that measure bone mass alone show substantial overlap of the measurements of osteoporotic patients who fracture with those that do not. Our aim is to develop noninvasive methods of evaluating bone structure on plain film radiographs to better predict fracture risk in osteoporosis. Regions of interest (ROIs) were selected from digitized lateral lumbar spine radiographs of 43 patients being seen in an osteoporosis clinic. The fractal dimension of these ROIs was estimated using a surface area method. The ability of fractal dimension to distinguish between cases that had fracture elsewhere in the spine from those that did not, was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. These results were compared with ROC analysis for these same patients using bone mineral density (BMD) measurements (bone mass). Significantly larger A z (area under ROC curve) values were obtained using fractal dimension (0.87) than from using BMD (0.58), indicating a better test performance using fractal dimension. Therefore, computerized radiographic methods to evaluate bone structure, such as fractal analysis, may be helpful in better determining fracture risk in osteoporosis.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here