z-logo
Premium
Two interpolating filters for scatter estimation
Author(s) -
Wagner Frederick C.,
Macovski Albert,
Nishimura Dwight G.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.596333
Subject(s) - sinc function , aliasing , interpolation (computer graphics) , artifact (error) , sampling (signal processing) , imaging phantom , mathematics , filter (signal processing) , image subtraction , image quality , sample (material) , optics , algorithm , image processing , computer science , artificial intelligence , computer vision , image (mathematics) , physics , mathematical analysis , binary image , thermodynamics
We have previously reported on a dual‐measurement sample‐and‐estimate technique for scatter correction. In this paper, we present a scatter‐correction technique that uses the previous sampling scheme but a different method of estimation. To provide samples of the scatter directly, an array of small, uniformly spaced lead disks is placed immediately before the object during only the first measurement. Interpolating from these samples we form an estimate of the scatter. We subtract this estimate from the second measurement to form a scatter‐corrected image. Previously, we used least‐squares interpolation to estimate the scatter. Because the samples are uniformly spaced, classical sampling theory motivated the investigation of interpolating filters for scatter estimation. To form the scatter image, we convolved the sample set with two different interpolating filters—a sinc function from classical sampling theory and a jinc function because the scatter function is radially symmetric. Using phantoms as objects, we applied both filters for scatter correction in vessel imaging and energy‐subtraction imaging. Initial corrected images contained an artifact attributed to aliasing. We modified the filter widths to reduce the aliasing. Although improvements in image quality were measured and the artifact was less pronounced, the artifact was still present. We present the phantom results obtained with this class of filters and discuss methods for its improved performance.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here