z-logo
Premium
The precision of T R extrapolation in magnetic resonance image synthesis
Author(s) -
Lee James N.,
Riederer Stephen J.,
Bobman Stuart A.,
Johnson Jeffrey P.,
Farzaneh Farhad
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.595954
Subject(s) - signal to noise ratio (imaging) , extrapolation , k space , image synthesis , imaging phantom , reduction (mathematics) , image (mathematics) , computer science , noise (video) , repetition (rhetorical device) , range (aeronautics) , noise reduction , artificial intelligence , contrast to noise ratio , image quality , synthetic data , magnetic resonance imaging , physics , mathematics , optics , materials science , statistics , linguistics , philosophy , medicine , radiology , geometry , composite material
We present a model of noise propagation from acquired magnetic resonance (MR) images to T R ‐extrapolated synthetic images. This model assumes that images acquired at two repetition times T R1and T R2are used to generate synthetic images at arbitrary repetition times T R . The predictions of the model are compared with experimentally acquired phantom data, and show excellent agreement. The model is utilized in an analysis of two applications of MR image synthesis: scan time reduction and multiple‐image synthesis. Scan time is reduced by acquiring data at two short repetition times, and synthesizing at a longer repetition time, with T R1+T R2less than T R . For T 1 =800 ms, a reduction of 20% in scan time results in a 45% reduction in signal‐to‐noise ratio SNR, when compared to direct acquisition. Reducing scan time by much more than 20% produces large noise levels in the synthetic image, and is unlikely to be useful. In multiple‐image synthesis, images are synthesized at any repetition time in the range 0 to T R1+T R2 , for contrast optimization. If T 1 =800 ms, and T R1+T R2 =2000 ms, the optimum combination of T R1, T Rresults in synthetic images whose SNR is at worst 22% less than the SNR of directly acquired images. For many values of T R , the synthetic images have SNR superior to that obtainable by direct acquisition.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom