z-logo
Premium
A signal‐to‐noise calibration procedure for NMR imaging systems
Author(s) -
Edelstein W. A.,
Bottomley Paul A.,
Pfeifer Leah M.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.595484
Subject(s) - calibration , resistor , signal (programming language) , noise (video) , imaging phantom , electromagnetic coil , nuclear magnetic resonance , signal to noise ratio (imaging) , johnson–nyquist noise , radiofrequency coil , physics , inductance , acoustics , capacitor , materials science , optics , computational physics , computer science , detector , voltage , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics) , programming language
A nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging system signal‐to‐noise calibration technique based on an NMR projection of distilled water in a cylindrical bottle is proposed. This measurement can characterize any arrangement of rf coils in any magnetic field as signal to noise per ml times root Hz. Inductive losses in a typical patient must be included in the calibration, and such losses can be simulated in a particular system by an externally attached resistor(s) appropriate to that system. Alternatively, an rf inductive damping phantom consisting of a conducting loop of wire containing an appropriate resistor is suggested that can be inserted into any NMR imaging coil to simulate subject Q damping. The same resistor can be used, independent of the details of the coil construction. Furthermore, if the loop inductance is tuned out at each frequency with a series capacitor, then the same loop resistance will serve for all frequencies as a good approximation to human subject damping. This “projection method” signal‐to‐noise ratio is related to the conventional signal‐to‐noise ratio measured from a Lorentzian‐shaped spectral line as ψ P =ψ L [2/ T 2 ] 1/2 , where ψ stands for signal‐to‐noise ratio, subscripts P and L stand, respectively, for the projection and “Lorentzian” methods, and T 2 is the transverse relaxation time of the spectral line used in the Lorentzian method.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here