Premium
Comparison of ion chamber and TLD dosimetry in mammography
Author(s) -
Stanton Leonard,
Day J. L.,
Brattelli S. D.,
Lightfoot D. A.,
Vince M. A.,
Stanton R. E.
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.595031
Subject(s) - ionization chamber , thermoluminescent dosimeter , dosimetry , imaging phantom , mammography , nuclear medicine , materials science , ionization , ion , physics , dosimeter , medicine , breast cancer , cancer , quantum mechanics
An ionization chamber method has been developed to measure exposure vs depth in a uniform BR 12 “average breast” phantom. It employs a Memorial mammography chamber for exit exposure measurements; resulting data is then corrected for backscatter as well as for the exceptionally thin window of this chamber. A careful comparison has then been made with relative exposure vs depth curves obtained using TLD at several mammography beam qualities, for identical exposure factors and SSD values. Use of a correction for residual and background TL signals significantly improved agreement between TLD and ion chamber curves in the 28 to 35 kVp/0.03 mm Mo range of beam quality. Agreement was within ±5% for the Mo target tube, but TLD readings were 4%–8% higher than ion chamber values for the W/Mo target tube. At Xeromammography energies (45 kVp/1.6 mm Al), corrected TLD curve readings were 6% higher at depth than ion chamber curve values. TLD measurements with 28 to 35 kVp/0.03 mm Mo beams tend to underestimate dosage to the midbreast parenchyma. For example, in a 5 cm “average breast”, the underestimation ranges from 2%–10% for corrected, 10%–16% for uncorrected TLD readings. Key words: Mammography dosimetry, mammography, thermoluminescent dosimetry, ion chamber dosimetry