z-logo
Premium
Sci‐Fri AM: MRI and Diagnostic Imaging ‐ 05: Comparison of Input Function Measurements from DCE and MOLLI
Author(s) -
Majtenyi Nicholas,
Juma Hanif,
Klein Ran,
deKemp Robert A.,
Cron Greg O.,
Nguyen Thanh B.,
Cameron Ian G.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4961836
Subject(s) - washout , phase (matter) , nuclear medicine , reproducibility , gold standard (test) , nuclear magnetic resonance , biomedical engineering , medicine , mathematics , radiology , physics , statistics , quantum mechanics
Dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI is a technique for obtaining tissue hemodynamic information (e.g. tumours). Despite widespread clinical application of DCE‐MRI, the technique suffers from a lack of standardization and accuracy, especially with respect to the concentration‐versus‐time of gadolinium (Gd) in feeding arteries (the input function, IF). MR phase has a linear quantitative relationship with Gd concentration ([Gd]), making it ideal for measuring the first‐pass of the IF, but is not considered accurate in the steady‐state washout. Modified Look‐Locker Inversion Recovery (MOLLI) is a fast and accurate method to measure T1 and has been validated to quantify typical [Gd] ranges experienced in the washout of the IF. Two different methods to measure the IF for DCE‐MRI were compared: 1) conventional phase‐versus‐time (“Phase‐only”) and 2) phase‐versus‐time combined with pre‐ and post‐DCE MOLLI T1 measurements (“Phase+MOLLI”). The IF obtained from Phase+MOLLI was calculated from MOLLI T1 values and known relaxivity, then added to the Phase‐only acquisition with the washout IF subtracted. A significant difference was observed between IF values for [Gd] between the Phase‐only and Phase+MOLLI acquisitions (P = 0.03). To ensure the IFs from MOLLI T1s were accurate, it was compared to [Gd] obtained from “gold‐standard” inversion recovery (IR). MOLLI showed excellent agreement with IR when imaged in static phantoms (r 2 = 0.997, P = 0.001). The Phase+MOLLI IF was more accurate than the Phase‐only IF in measuring the washout. The Phase+MOLLI acquisition may therefore provide a DCE‐MRI reference standard that could lead to better clinical diagnoses.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom