Premium
TU‐H‐BRA‐09: Relationship Between B0 and the Contrast‐To‐Noise Ratio (CNR) of Tumour to Background for MRI/Radiotherapy Hybrids
Author(s) -
Wachowicz K,
DeZanche N,
Yip E,
Volotovskyy V,
Fallone B
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4957631
Subject(s) - glioma , radiation therapy , magnetic resonance imaging , contrast to noise ratio , nuclear medicine , relaxation (psychology) , nuclear magnetic resonance , medicine , physics , radiology , computer science , cancer research , image quality , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics)
Purpose: To investigate the relationship in MRI between B 0 and the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) of various tumour/normal tissue pairs. This study is motivated by the current interest in MRI/radiotherapy hybrids, for which multiple magnetic field strengths have been proposed. CNR is the single most important parameter governing the ability of a system to identify a tumour in real time for treatment guidance. The MRI community has long since recognized that the SNR of a well‐designed MR system is roughly proportional to B 0 , the polarizing magnetic field. However, the CNR between two tissues is much more complicated ‐ dependent not only on this signal behavior, but also on the different relaxation properties of the tissues. Methods: Experimentally‐based models of B 0 ‐dependant relaxation for various tumour and normal tissues from the literature were used in conjunction with signal equations for MR sequences suitable for rapid realtime imaging to develop field‐dependent predictions for CNR. These CNR models were developed for liver, lung, breast, glioma, and kidney tumours for spoiled‐gradient echo (SGE) and balanced steady‐state free precession (bSSFP) sequences. Results: In all cases there was an improved CNR at lower fields compared to linear dependency. Further, in some tumour sites, the CNR at lower fields was found to be comparable to, or sometimes higher than those at higher fields (i.e. bSSFP CNR for glioma, kidney and liver tumours). Conclusion: Due to the variation of tissue relaxation parameters with field, lower B 0 fields have been shown to perform as well or better (in terms of CNR) than higher fields for some tumour sites. In other sites this effect was less pronounced. It is the complex relationship between CNR and B 0 that leads to greater CNR at 0.5 T for certain tumour types studied here for fast imaging. B. Gino Fallone is a co‐founder and CEO of MagnetTx Oncology Solutions (under discussions to license Alberta bi‐planar linac MR for commercialization)