z-logo
Premium
TU‐FG‐BRB‐04: A New Optimization Method for Pre‐Treatment Patient‐Specific Stopping‐Power by Combining Proton Radiography and X‐Ray CT
Author(s) -
CollinsFekete C,
Schulte R,
Beaulieu L,
Seco J
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4957544
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , proton therapy , stopping power , nuclear medicine , hounsfield scale , medical imaging , computed radiography , radiography , mathematics , proton , physics , computer science , computed tomography , medicine , radiology , optics , image quality , artificial intelligence , detector , image (mathematics) , nuclear physics
Purpose: The relative stopping power (RSP) uncertainty is the largest contributor to the range uncertainty in proton therapy. The purpose of this work is to develop a robust and systematic method that yields accurate patient specific RSPs by combining pre‐treatment X‐ray CT and daily proton radiography. Methods: The method is formulated as a penalized least squares optimization (PLSO) problem min(|Ax‐B|). The matrix A represents the cumulative path‐length crossed in each material computed by calculating proton trajectories through the X‐ray CT. The material RSPs are denoted by x and B is the pRad, expressed as water equivalent thickness. The equation is solved using a convex‐conic optimizer. Geant4 simulations were made to assess the feasibility of the method. RSP extracted from the Geant4 materials were used as a reference and the clinical HU‐RSP curve as a comparison. The PLSO was first tested on a Gammex RMI‐467 phantom. Then, anthropomorphic phantoms of the head, pelvis and lung were studied and resulting RSPs were evaluated. A pencil beam was generated in each phantom to evaluate the proton range accuracy achievable by using the optimized RSPs. Finally, experimental data of a pediatric head phantom (CIRS) were acquired using a recently completed experimental pCT scanner. Results: Numerical simulations showed precise RSP (<0.75%) for Gammex materials except low‐density lung (LN‐300) (1.2%). Accurate RSP have been obtained for the head (µ=−0.10%, 1.5σ=1.12%), lung (µ=−0.33, 1.5σ=1.02%) and pelvis anthropomorphic phantoms (µ=0.12, 1.5σ=0,99%). The range precision has been improved with an average R80 difference to the reference (µ±1.5σ) of −0.20±0.35%, −0.47±0.92% and −0.06±0.17% in the head, lung and pelvis phantoms respectively, compared to the 3.5% clinical margin. Experimental HU‐RSP curve have been produced on the CIRS pediatric head. Conclusion: The proposed PLSO with prior knowledge X‐ray CT shows promising potential (R80 σ<1.0% over all sites) to decrease the range uncertainty.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom