Premium
MO‐FG‐CAMPUS‐TeP2‐03: Multi‐Criteria Optimization Using Taguchi Method for SRS of Multiple Lesions by Single Isocenter
Author(s) -
Alani S,
Honig N,
Schlocker A,
Corn B
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4957361
Subject(s) - isocenter , collimator , taguchi methods , nuclear medicine , radiation treatment planning , arc (geometry) , computer science , mathematics , optics , physics , statistics , medicine , radiation therapy , surgery , imaging phantom , geometry
Purpose: This study utilizes the Taguchi Method to evaluate the VMAT planning parameters of single isocenter treatment plans for multiple brain metastases. An optimization model based on Taguchi and utility concept is employed to optimize the planning parameters including: arc arrangement, calculation grid size, calculation model, and beam energy on multiple performance characteristics namely conformity index and dose to normal brain. Methods: Treatment plans, each with 4 metastatic brain lesions were planned using single isocenter technique. The collimator angles were optimized to avoid open areas. In this analysis four planning parameters (a–d) were considered: (a)‐Arc arrangements: set1: Gantry 181cw179 couch0; gantry179ccw0, couch315; and gantry0ccw181, couch45. set2: set1 plus additional arc: Gantry 0cw179, couch270. (b)‐Energy: 6‐MV; 6MV‐FFF (c)‐Calculation grid size: 1mm; 1.5mm (d)‐Calculation models: AAA; Acuros Treatment planning was performed in Varian Eclipse (ver.11.0.30). A suitable orthogonal array was selected (L8) to perform the experiments. After conducting the experiments with the combinations of planning parameters the conformity index (CI) and the normal brain dose S/N ratio for each parameter was calculated. Optimum levels for the multiple response optimizations were determined. Results: We determined that the factors most affecting the conformity index are arc arrangement and beam energy. These tests were also used to evaluate dose to normal brain. In these evaluations, the significant parameters were grid size and calculation model. Using the utility concept we determined the combination of each of the four factors tested in this study that most significantly influence quality of the resulting treatment plans: (a)‐arc arrangement‐set2, (b)‐6MV, (c)‐calc.grid 1mm, (d)‐Acuros algorithm. Overall, the dominant significant influences on plan quality are (a)‐arcarrangement, and (b)‐beamenergy. Conclusion: Results were analyzed using ANOVA and were found to be within the confidence interval. Further investigation using this methodology. Such parameters might include: virtual OAR and optimization criterion such as normal tissue objective.