z-logo
Premium
SU‐G‐TeP3‐12: Retrospective Assessment of R2star Using Ultra‐High Field MRI in a Rodent Model of Radiation Necrosis
Author(s) -
Belliveau J,
Me R
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4957092
Subject(s) - necrosis , nuclear medicine , medicine , magnetic resonance imaging , gadolinium , irradiation , radiation therapy , radiology , pathology , chemistry , physics , organic chemistry , nuclear physics
Purpose: To establish a quantitative MRI method that would be capable of predicting radiation necrosis without using a contrast agent. Methods: Healthy male Fischer 344 rats were irradiated using an animal irradiator capable of delivering 2.3 Gy/min with a kVp of 225 V. A dose of 40 Gy was given to half the brain in a single session. Rats were scanned using a 9.4 T animal MRI before irradiation and every two weeks following radiation until either necrosis developed or they were sacrificed for health reasons. A multi‐echo gradient‐echo sequence was acquired at every time point and the apparent transverse relaxation rate R 2 * was calculated based on the measured signal decay. At the last time point, an ROI mask with an R 2 * value of greater than 45 s −1 was applied in the area of the external and internal capsule where radiation necrosis was confirmed. A retrospective analysis was performed to determine whether R 2 * values would be able to predict where radiation necrosis would occur. Results: Radiation necrosis was morphologically visible between weeks 22–24 following treatment. Gadolinium MRI and histology confirmed radiation necrosis in the area of MRI enhancement. Our data suggests that there is a trend towards significance in the lesion as early as 12 weeks prior to morphological changes on MRI with significance occurring 6 weeks prior (p≤0.05, p≤0.01 at week 24). Measurements of the R 2 * in the hippocampus did not show any significant difference; however, there are areas of visible R 2 * change within sub‐hippocampal regions. Conclusion: R 2 * is a promising method that could be able to predict an underlying disease process that occurs prior to radiation necrosis. The constant increase in R 2 * values suggests a possible neuroinflammatory mechanism rather than an acute vascular event where R 2 * would tend to decrease in the area.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom