Premium
SU‐F‐T‐552: A One‐Year Evaluation of the QABeamChecker+ for Use with the CyberKnife System
Author(s) -
Gersh J
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4956737
Subject(s) - cyberknife , nuclear medicine , calibration , fiducial marker , standard deviation , ionization chamber , medicine , biomedical engineering , computer science , radiosurgery , mathematics , physics , artificial intelligence , surgery , ionization , radiation therapy , ion , statistics , quantum mechanics
Purpose: By attaching an adapter plate with fiducial markers to the QA BeamChecker+ (Standard Imaging, Inc., Middleton, WI), the output of the CyberKnife can be accurately, efficiently, and consistently evaluated. The adapter plate, known as the Cutting Board, allows for automated alignment of the QABC+ using the CK's stereoscopic kV image‐based treatment localization system (TLS). Described herein is an evaluation of the system following a year of clinical utilization. Methods: Based on a CT scan of the QABC+ and CB, a treatment plan is generated which delivers a beam to each of the 5 plane‐parallel ionization chambers. Following absolute calibration of the CK, the QA plan is delivered, and baseline measurements are acquired (and automatically corrected for temperature and pressure). This test was performed at the beginning of each treatment day for a year. A calibration evaluation (using a water‐equivalent slab and short thimble chamber) is performed every four weeks, or whenever the QABC+ detects a deviation of more than 1.0%. Results: During baseline evaluation, repeat measurements (n=10) were performed, with an average output of 0.25% with an SD of 0.11%. As a test of the reposition of the QABC+ and CB, ten additional measurements were performed where between each acquisition, the entire system was removed and re‐positioned using the TLS. The average output deviation was 0.30% with a SD of 0.13%. During the course of the year, 187 QABC+ measurements and 13 slab‐based measurements were performed. The output measurements of the QABC+ correlated well with slab‐based measurements (R2=0.909). Conclusion: By using the QABC+ and CB, daily output was evaluated accurately, efficiently, and consistently. From setup to break‐down (including analysis), this test required 5 minutes instead of approximately 15 using traditional techniques (collimator‐mounted ionization chambers). Additionally, by automatically saving resultant output deviation to a database, trend analysis was simplified. Spectrum Medical Physics, LLC of Greenville, SC has a consulting contract with Standard Imaging of Middleton, WI