Premium
SU‐F‐T‐404: Dosimetric Advantages of Flattening Free Beams to Prone Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation
Author(s) -
Galavis P,
Barbee D,
Jozsef G
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4956589
Subject(s) - nuclear medicine , imaging phantom , dosimetry , medicine , flattening , irradiation , materials science , physics , nuclear physics , composite material
Purpose: Prone accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) results in dose reduction to the heart and lung. Flattening filter free beams (FFF) reduce out of field dose due to the reduced scatter from the removal of the flattening filter and reduce the buildup region. The aim of this work is to evaluate the dosimetric advantages of FFF beams to prone APBI target coverage and reduction in dose to organs at risk. Methods: Fifteen clinical prone APBI cases using flattened photon beams were retrospectively re‐planned in Eclipse‐TPS using FFF beams. FFF plans were designed to provide equivalent target coverage with similar hotspots using the same field arrangements, resulting in comparable target DVHs. Both plans were transferred to a prone breast phantom and delivered on Varian‐Edge‐Linac. GafChromic‐film was placed in the coronal plane of the phantom, partially overlapping the treatment field and extending into OARs to compare dose profiles from both plans. Results: FFF plans were comparable to the clinical plans with maximum doses of (108.3±2.3)% and (109.2±2.4)% and mean doses of (104.5±1.0)% and (104.6±1.2)%, respectively. Similar mean dose doses to the heart and contralateral lungs were observed from both plans, whereas the mean dose to the contra‐lateral breast was (2.79±1.18) cGy and (2.86±1.40) cGy for FFF and clinical plans respectively. However for both plans the error between calculated and measured doses at 4 cm from the field edge was 10%. Conclusion: The results showed that FFF beams in prone APBI provide dosimetrically equivalent target coverage and improved coverage in superficial target due to softer energy spectra. Film analysis showed that the TPS underestimates dose outside field edges for both cases. The FFF measured plans showed less dose outside the beam that might reduce the probability of secondary cancers in the contralateral breast.