Premium
SU‐F‐T‐197: Investigating Optimal Oblique‐Beam Arrangement for Bilateral Metallic Prosthesis Prostate Cancer in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
Author(s) -
Rana S,
Zheng Y,
Cheng C,
Singh H,
Twyford T,
Tesfamicael B,
Park S
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4956334
Subject(s) - nuclear medicine , pencil beam scanning , proton therapy , medicine , rectum , cone beam computed tomography , oblique case , pencil (optics) , radiation treatment planning , dosimetry , radiation therapy , radiology , optics , computed tomography , surgery , physics , linguistics , philosophy
Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to investigate the optimum oblique‐beam arrangement for bilateral metallic prosthesis prostate cancer treatment in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. Methods: A computed tomography dataset of bilateral metallic prosthesis prostate cancer case was selected for this retrospective study. A total of four beams (rightanterior‐ oblique [RAO], left‐anterior‐oblique [LAO], left‐posterior‐oblique [LPO], and right‐posterior‐oblique [RPO]) were selected for treatment planning. PBS plans were generated using multi‐field‐optimization technique for a total dose of 79.2 Gy[RBE] to be delivered in 44 fractions. Specifically, five different PBS plans were generated based on 2.5% ± 2 mm range uncertainty using five different beam arrangements (i)LAO+RAO+LPO+RPO, (ii)LAO+RAO, (iii)LPO+RPO, (iv)RAO+LPO, and (v)LAO+RPO. Each PBS plan was optimized by applying identical dose‐volume constraints to the PTV, rectum, and bladder. Treatment plans were then compared based on the dose‐volume histograms results. Results: The PTV coverage was found to be greater than 99% in all five plans. The homogeneity index (HI) was found to be almost identical (range, 0.03–0.04). The PTV mean dose was found to be comparable (range, 81.0–81.1 Gy[RBE]). For the rectum, the lowest mean dose (8.0 Gy[RBE]) and highest mean dose (31.1 Gy[RBE]) were found in RAO+LAO plan and LPO+RPO plan, respectively. LAO+RAO plan produced the most favorable dosimetric results of the rectum in the medium‐dose region (V50) and high‐dose region (V70). For the bladder, the lowest (5.0 Gy[RBE]) and highest mean dose (10.3 Gy[RBE]) were found in LPO+RPO plan and RAO+LAO plan, respectively. Other dosimetric results (V50 and V70) of the bladder were slightly better in LPO+RPO plan than in other plans. Conclusion: Dosimetric findings from this study suggest that two anterior‐oblique proton beams arrangement (LAO+RAO) is a more favorable option with the possibility of reducing rectal dose significantly while maintaining comparable target coverage and acceptable bladder dose.