Premium
SU‐F‐T‐138: Commissioning and Evaluating Dose Computation Models for a Dedicated Proton Line Scanning Beam Nozzle in Eclipse Treatment Planning System
Author(s) -
Tsai P,
Huang H,
Cai S,
Chen H,
Wu S,
Wu T,
Lee S,
Yeh C,
Wu T,
Lee C
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4956274
Subject(s) - isocenter , ionization chamber , proton therapy , beam (structure) , beamline , dose profile , dosimetry , optics , percentage depth dose curve , nozzle , physics , eclipse , pencil beam scanning , radiation treatment planning , nuclear medicine , computational physics , ionization , imaging phantom , radiation therapy , medicine , ion , quantum mechanics , astronomy , thermodynamics
Purpose: In this study, we present an effective method to derive low dose envelope of the proton in‐air spot fluence at beam positions other than the isocenter to reduce amount of measurements required for planning commission. Also, we demonstrate commissioning and validation results of this method to the Eclipse treatment planning system (version 13.0.29) for a Sumitomo dedicated proton line scanning beam nozzle. Methods: The in‐air spot profiles at five beam‐axis positions (±200, ±100 and 0 mm) were obtained in trigger mode using a MP3 Water tank (PTW‐Freiburg) and a pinpoint ionization chamber (model 31014, PTW‐Freiburg). Low dose envelope (below 1% of the center dose) of the spot profile at isocenter was obtained by repeated point measurements to minimize dosimetry uncertainty. The double Gaussian (DG) model was used to fit and obtain optimal σ1, σ2 and their corresponding weightings through our in‐house MATLAB (Mathworks) program. σ1, σ2 were assumed to expand linearly along the beam axis from a virtual source position calculated by back projecting fitted sigmas from the single Gaussian (SG) model. Absolute doses in water were validated using an Advanced Markus chamber at the depth of 2cm with Pristine Peak (BP) R90d ranging from 5–32 cm for 10×10 cm2 scanned fields. The field size factors were verified with square fields from 2 to 20 cm at 2cm and before BP depth. Results: The absolute dose outputs were found to be within ±3%. For field size factor, the agreement between calculated and measurement were within ±2% at 2cm and ±3% before BP, except for the field size below 2×2 cm2. Conclusion: The double Gaussian model was found to be sufficient for characterizing the Sumitomo dedicated proton line scanning nozzle. With our effective double Gaussian fitting method, we are able to save significant proton beam time with acceptable output accuracy.