z-logo
Premium
SU‐F‐J‐20: Commissioning and Acceptance Testing of the C‐Rad CatalystHD Surface Imaging System
Author(s) -
Stanley D,
Rasmussen K,
Kirby N,
Papanikolaou N,
Gutierrez A
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4955928
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , reproducibility , acceptance testing , image guided radiation therapy , computer science , medical physics , simulation , medical imaging , optics , physics , mathematics , artificial intelligence , statistics , software engineering
With the increasing use of surface‐based, nonionizing image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT) systems, a comprehensive set of clinical acceptance and commissioning procedures are needed to ensure correct functionality and proper clinical integration. Although TG‐147 provides a specific set of parameters, measurement methodologies have yet to be described. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of the commissioning and acceptance analysis performed for the C‐Rad CatalystHD imaging system. Methods and Materials: Methodology for the commissioning and acceptance of the C‐Rad CatalystHD imaging system was developed using commercially available clinical equipment. Following TG‐147 guidelines, the following tests were performed: integration of peripheral equipment, system drift, static spatial reproducibility and localization accuracy, static end‐to‐end analysis, static rotational accuracy, dynamic spatial accuracy, dynamic temporal accuracy, dynamic radiation delivery and a comprehensive end‐to‐end analysis. Results: The field of view (FOV) of the CatalystHD was 105×109×83 cm3 in the lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions. For thermal equilibrium and system drift, a thermal drift of 1.0mm was noted. A 45 min warmup time is recommended if the system has been shut off an extended period of time (>24 hours) before the QA procedure to eliminate any thermal drift. Spatial reproducibility was found to be 0.05±0.03 mm using a rigid phantom. For the static localization accuracy, system agreement with couch shifts was within 0.1±0.1 mm and positioning agreement with kV‐CBCT was 0.16±0.10 mm. For static rotational accuracy, system agreement with a high precision rotational stage (0.01 deg precision) was within 0.10±0.07 deg. Dynamic spatial and temporal localization accuracy was found to be within 0.2±0.1 mm. Conclusion: A comprehensive commissioning and acceptance study was performed using commercially available phantoms and in‐house methodologies to provide a performance evaluation of the CatalystHD imaging system.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom