Premium
SU‐F‐R‐35: Repeatability of Texture Features in T1‐ and T2‐Weighted MR Images
Author(s) -
Mahon R,
Weiss E,
Ford J,
Karki K,
Hugo G
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4955807
Subject(s) - repeatability , artificial intelligence , mathematics , pattern recognition (psychology) , wavelet , image texture , histogram , nuclear medicine , computer science , computer vision , image processing , image (mathematics) , medicine , statistics
Purpose: To evaluate repeatability of lung tumor texture features from inspiration/expiration MR image pairs for potential use in patient specific care models and applications. Repeatability is a desirable and necessary characteristic of features included in such models. Methods: T1‐weighted Volumetric Interpolation Breath‐Hold Examination (VIBE) and/or T2‐weighted MRI scans were acquired for 15 patients with non‐small cell lung cancer before and during radiotherapy for a total of 32 and 34 same session inspiration‐expiration breath‐hold image pairs respectively. Bias correction was applied to the VIBE (VIBE_BC) and T2‐weighted (T2_BC) images. Fifty‐nine texture features at five wavelet decomposition ratios were extracted from the delineated primary tumor including: histogram(HIST), gray level co‐occurrence matrix(GLCM), gray level run length matrix(GLRLM), gray level size zone matrix(GLSZM), and neighborhood gray tone different matrix (NGTDM) based features. Repeatability of the texture features for VIBE, VIBE_BC, T2‐weighted, and T2_BC image pairs was evaluated by the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) between corresponding image pairs, with a value greater than 0.90 indicating repeatability. Results: For the VIBE image pairs, the percentage of repeatable texture features by wavelet ratio was between 20% and 24% of the 59 extracted features; the T2‐weighted image pairs exhibited repeatability in the range of 44–49%. The percentage dropped to 10–20% for the VIBE_BC images, and 12–14% for the T2_BC images. In addition, five texture features were found to be repeatable in all four image sets including two GLRLM, two GLZSM, and one NGTDN features. No single texture feature category was repeatable among all three image types; however, certain categories performed more consistently on a per image type basis. Conclusion: We identified repeatable texture features on T1‐ and T2‐weighted MRI scans. These texture features should be further investigated for use in specific applications such as tissue classification and changes during radiation therapy utilizing a standard imaging protocol. Authors have the following disclosures: a research agreement with Philips Medical systems (Hugo, Weiss), a license agreement with Varian Medical Systems (Hugo, Weiss), research grants from the National Institute of Health (Hugo, Weiss), UpToDate royalties (Weiss), and none(Mahon, Ford, Karki). Authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.