Premium
SU‐D‐207B‐02: Early Grade Classification in Meningioma Patients Combining Radiomics and Semantics Data
Author(s) -
Coroller T,
Bi W,
Abedalthagafi M,
Aizer A,
Wu W,
Greenwald N,
Beroukhim R,
AlMefty O,
Santagata S,
Dunn I,
Alexander B,
Huang R,
Aerts H
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4955670
Subject(s) - medicine , radiomics , meningioma , radiology , neuroradiologist , random forest , magnetic resonance imaging , nuclear medicine , receiver operating characteristic , artificial intelligence , computer science
Purpose: The clinical management of meningioma is guided by its grade and biologic behavior. Currently, diagnosis of tumor grade follows surgical resection and histopathologic review. Reliable techniques for pre‐operative determination of tumor behavior are needed. We investigated the association between imaging features extracted from preoperative gadolinium‐enhanced T1‐weighted MRI and meningioma grade. Methods: We retrospectively examined the pre‐operative MRI for 139 patients with de novo WHO grade I (63%) and grade II (37%) meningiomas. We investigated the predictive power of ten semantic radiologic features as determined by a neuroradiologist, fifteen radiomic features, and tumor location. Conventional (volume and diameter) imaging features were added for comparison. AUC was computed for continuous and χ 2 for discrete variables. Classification was done using random forest. Performance was evaluated using cross validation (1000 iterations, 75% training and 25% validation). All p‐values were adjusted for multiple testing. Results: Significant association was observed between meningioma grade and tumor location (p<0.001) and two semantic features including intra‐tumoral heterogeneity (p<0.001) and overt hemorrhage (p=0.01). Conventional (AUC 0.61–0.67) and eleven radiomic (AUC 0.60–0.70) features were significant from random (p<0.05, Noether test). Median AUC values for classification of tumor grade were 0.57, 0.71, 0.72 and 0.77 respectively for conventional, radiomic, location, and semantic features after using random forest. By combining all imaging data (semantic, radiomic, and location), the median AUC was 0.81, which offers superior predicting power to that of conventional imaging descriptors for meningioma as well as radiomic features alone (p<0.05, permutation test). Conclusion: We demonstrate a strong association between radiologic features and meningioma grade. Pre‐operative prediction of tumor behavior based on imaging features offers promise for guiding personalized medicine and improving patient management.