Premium
WE‐G‐207‐03: Mask Guided Image Reconstruction (MGIR): A Novel Method for Ultra‐Low‐Dose 3D and Enhanced 4D Cone‐Beam Computer‐Tomography
Author(s) -
Park C,
Zhang H,
Chen Y,
Fan Q,
Kahler D,
Li J,
Liu C,
Lu B
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4926096
Subject(s) - cone beam computed tomography , image quality , iterative reconstruction , computer vision , image guided radiation therapy , artificial intelligence , computer science , projection (relational algebra) , medical imaging , image noise , artifact (error) , nuclear medicine , mathematics , algorithm , image (mathematics) , computed tomography , medicine , radiology
Purpose: Recently, compressed sensing (CS) based iterative reconstruction (IR) method is receiving attentions to reconstruct high quality cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images using sparsely sampled or noisy projections. The aim of this study is to develop a novel baseline algorithm called Mask Guided Image Reconstruction (MGIR), which can provide superior image quality for both low‐dose 3DCBCT and 4DCBCT under single mathematical framework. Methods: In MGIR, the unknown CBCT volume was mathematically modeled as a combination of two regions where anatomical structures are 1) within the priori‐defined mask and 2) outside the mask. Then we update each part of images alternatively thorough solving minimization problems based on CS type IR. For low‐dose 3DCBCT, the former region is defined as the anatomically complex region where it is focused to preserve edge information while latter region is defined as contrast uniform, and hence aggressively updated to remove noise/artifact. In 4DCBCT, the regions are separated as the common static part and moving part. Then, static volume and moving volumes were updated with global and phase sorted projection respectively, to optimize the image quality of both moving and static part simultaneously. Results: Examination of MGIR algorithm showed that high quality of both low‐dose 3DCBCT and 4DCBCT images can be reconstructed without compromising the image resolution and imaging dose or scanning time respectively. For low‐dose 3DCBCT, a clinical viable and high resolution head‐and‐neck image can be obtained while cutting the dose by 83%. In 4DCBCT, excellent quality 4DCBCT images could be reconstructed while requiring no more projection data and imaging dose than a typical clinical 3DCBCT scan. Conclusion: The results shown that the image quality of MGIR was superior compared to other published CS based IR algorithms for both 4DCBCT and low‐dose 3DCBCT. This makes our MGIR algorithm potentially useful in various on‐line clinical applications. Provisional Patent: UF#15476; WGS Ref. No. U1198.70067US00