z-logo
Premium
MO‐F‐CAMPUS‐I‐05: Quantitative ADC Measurement of Esophageal Cancer Before and After Chemoradiation
Author(s) -
Yang L,
Son JB,
Ma J,
Cheng S,
Hazle J,
Carter BW,
Lin S
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4925471
Subject(s) - nuclear medicine , medicine , diffusion mri , magnetic resonance imaging , scanner , imaging biomarker , radiology , physics , optics
Purpose: We investigated whether quantitative diffusion imaging can be used as an imaging biomarker for early prediction of treatment response of esophageal cancer. Methods: Eight patients with esophageal cancer underwent a baseline and an interim MRI studies during chemoradiation on a 3T whole body MRI scanner with an 8‐channel torso phased array coil. Each MRI study contained two axial diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) series with a conventional DWI sequence and a reduced field‐of‐view DWI sequence (FOCUS) of varying b‐values. ADC maps with two b‐values were computed from conventional DWI images using a mono‐exponential model. For each of DWI sequences, separate ADCall was computed by fitting the signal intensity of images with all the b‐values to a single exponential model. For the FOCUS sequence, a bi‐exponential model was used to extract perfusion and diffusion coefficients (ADCperf and ADCdiff) and their contributions to the signal decay. A board‐certified radiologist contoured the tumor region and mean ADC values and standard deviations of tumor and muscle ROIs were recorded from different ADC maps. Results: Our results showed that (1) the magnitude of ADCs from the same ROIs by the different analysis methods can be substantially different. (2) For a given method, the change between the baseline and interim muscle ADCs was relatively small (≤10%). In contrast, the change between the baseline and interim tumor ADCs was substantially larger, with the change in ADCdiff by FOCUS DWI showing the largest percentage change of 73.2%. (3) The range of the relative change of a specific parameter for different patients was also different. Conclusion: Presently, we do not have the final pathological confirmation of the treatment response for all the patients. However, for a few patients whose surgical specimen is available, the quantitative ADC changes have been found to be useful as a potential predictor for treatment response.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom