Premium
MO‐F‐CAMPUS‐I‐01: EIT Imaging to Monitor Human Salivary Gland Functionality: A Feasibility Study
Author(s) -
Kohli K,
Karvat A,
Liu J,
Krishnan K
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4925467
Subject(s) - electrical impedance tomography , stimulation , biomedical engineering , tomography , electrical impedance , electrode , materials science , conductivity , nuclear medicine , medicine , physics , optics , quantum mechanics
Purpose: Clinically, there exists a need to develop a non‐invasive technique for monitoring salivary activity. In this study, we investigate the feasibility of a using the electrical conductivity information from Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to monitor salivary flow activity. Methods: To acquire EIT data, eight Ag/AgCl ECG electrodes were placed around the mandible of the subject. An EIT scan was obtained by injecting current at 50 KHz, 0.4 mA through each pair of electrodes and recording voltage across other electrode pairs. The functional conductivity image was obtained through reconstruction of the voltage data, using Electrical Impedance Tomography and Diffuse Optical Tomography Reconstruction Software (EIDORS) in Matlab. In using EIDORS, forward solution was obtained using a user‐defined finite element model shape and inverse solution was obtained using one‐step Gaussian solver. EIT scans of volunteer research team members were acquired for three different physiological states: pre‐stimulation, stimulation and post‐stimulation. For pre‐stimulation phase, data were collected in intervals of 5 minutes for 15 minutes. The salivary glands were then stimulated in the subject using lemon and the data were collected immediately. Post‐stimulation data were collected at 4 different timings after stimulation. Results: Variations were observed in the electrical conductivity patterns near parotid regions between the pre‐ and post‐stimulation stages. The three images acquired during the 15 minute pre‐stimulation phase showed no major changes in the conductivity. Immediately after stimulation, electrical conductivity increased near parotid regions and 15 minutes later slowly returned to pre‐stimulation level. Conclusion: In the present study involving human subjects, the change in electrical conductivity pattern shown in the EIT images, acquired at different times with and without stimulation of salivary glands, appeared to be consistent with the change in salivary gland activity. The conductivity changes imaged through EIT are potentially useful for the purpose of salivary monitoring.