Premium
SU‐E‐T‐810: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Conventional Intensity‐Modulated Radiotherapy for Non‐Small‐Cell Lung Cancer with Simultaneously Integrated Boost Radiation Therapy: A Planning Comparison Study
Author(s) -
Liu T,
Chen J,
Zhang G,
Sun T
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4925174
Subject(s) - medicine , radiation therapy , nuclear medicine , dosimetry , lung cancer , lung , radiation treatment planning , radiology , oncology
Purpose: To compare and analyze the characteristics of intensity‐modulated arc therapy(IMAT) versus fixed‐gantry intensity‐modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) in treatment of non‐small‐cell lung cancer. Methods: Twelve patients treated in our radiotherapy center were selected for this study. The patient subsequently underwent 4D‐CT simulation.Margins of 5mm and 10mm were added to the ITV to generate the CTV and PTV respectively. Three treatment plans (IMRT,one single arc (RA1),double arcs (RA2))were generated with Eclipse ver.8.6 planning systems. Using a dose level of 75Gy in 15fractions to the ITV,60Gy in 15fractions to the CTV and 45Gy in 15fractions to the PTV respectively. The target and normol tissue volumes were compared,as were the dosimetry parameters. Results: There were no significant differences in CI of ITV,PTV,HI of ITV,CTV and PTV, V5,V10,V15,V20,V25,V30,V45,V50 of total‐lung and mean lung dose (all p>0.05). However, the differences were significant in terms of CI of CTV,V5 of B‐P (all p<0.05). On the MU, IMRT=1540MU,RA1=1006 MU and RA2=1096 MU. (F=12.00,P=0.000).On the treatment time, IMRT= 13.5min,RA1= 1.5min,and RA2=2.5 min (F= 30.11,P=0.000 ). Conclusion: IMAT is equal to IMRT in dosimetril evaluation. Due to much less Mu and delivery time,IMAT is an ideal technique in treating patients by reduceing the uncomfortable influnce which could effect the treatment.