Premium
Proton dose calculation on scatter‐corrected CBCT image: Feasibility study for adaptive proton therapy
Author(s) -
Park YangKyun,
Sharp Gregory C.,
Phillips Justin,
Winey Brian A.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4923179
Subject(s) - proton therapy , cone beam computed tomography , nuclear medicine , projection (relational algebra) , image guided radiation therapy , medical imaging , mathematics , medicine , computer science , computed tomography , artificial intelligence , radiology , algorithm , radiation therapy
Purpose: To demonstrate the feasibility of proton dose calculation on scatter‐corrected cone‐beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images for the purpose of adaptive proton therapy. Methods: CBCT projection images were acquired from anthropomorphic phantoms and a prostate patient using an on‐board imaging system of an Elekta infinity linear accelerator. Two previously introduced techniques were used to correct the scattered x‐rays in the raw projection images: uniform scatter correction (CBCT us ) and a priori CT‐based scatter correction (CBCT ap ). CBCT images were reconstructed using a standard FDK algorithm and GPU‐based reconstruction toolkit. Soft tissue ROI‐based HU shifting was used to improve HU accuracy of the uncorrected CBCT images and CBCT us , while no HU change was applied to the CBCT ap . The degree of equivalence of the corrected CBCT images with respect to the reference CT image (CT ref ) was evaluated by using angular profiles of water equivalent path length (WEPL) and passively scattered proton treatment plans. The CBCT ap was further evaluated in more realistic scenarios such as rectal filling and weight loss to assess the effect of mismatched prior information on the corrected images. Results: The uncorrected CBCT and CBCT us images demonstrated substantial WEPL discrepancies (7.3 ± 5.3 mm and 11.1 ± 6.6 mm, respectively) with respect to the CT ref , while the CBCT ap images showed substantially reduced WEPL errors (2.4 ± 2.0 mm). Similarly, the CBCT ap ‐based treatment plans demonstrated a high pass rate (96.0% ± 2.5% in 2 mm/2% criteria) in a 3D gamma analysis. Conclusions: A priori CT‐based scatter correction technique was shown to be promising for adaptive proton therapy, as it achieved equivalent proton dose distributions and water equivalent path lengths compared to those of a reference CT in a selection of anthropomorphic phantoms.