Premium
Development and evaluation of aperture‐based complexity metrics using film and EPID measurements of static MLC openings
Author(s) -
Götstedt Julia,
Karlsson Hauer Anna,
Bäck Anna
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4921733
Subject(s) - multileaf collimator , aperture (computer memory) , metric (unit) , dosimetry , collimator , context (archaeology) , pixel , medical imaging , computer science , mathematics , optics , algorithm , artificial intelligence , nuclear medicine , linear particle accelerator , beam (structure) , physics , acoustics , engineering , medicine , paleontology , operations management , biology
Purpose: Complexity metrics have been suggested as a complement to measurement‐based quality assurance for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). However, these metrics have not yet been sufficiently validated. This study develops and evaluates new aperture‐based complexity metrics in the context of static multileaf collimator (MLC) openings and compares them to previously published metrics. Methods: This study develops the converted aperture metric and the edge area metric . The converted aperture metric is based on small and irregular parts within the MLC opening that are quantified as measured distances between MLC leaves. The edge area metric is based on the relative size of the region around the edges defined by the MLC. Another metric suggested in this study is the circumference/area ratio. Earlier defined aperture‐based complexity metrics—the modulation complexity score , the edge metric , the ratio monitor units (MU)/Gy, the aperture area , and the aperture irregularity —are compared to the newly proposed metrics. A set of small and irregular static MLC openings are created which simulate individual IMRT/VMAT control points of various complexities. These are measured with both an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and EBT3 film. The differences between calculated and measured dose distributions are evaluated using a pixel‐by‐pixel comparison with two global dose difference criteria of 3% and 5%. The extent of the dose differences, expressed in terms of pass rate, is used as a measure of the complexity of the MLC openings and used for the evaluation of the metrics compared in this study. The different complexity scores are calculated for each created static MLC opening. The correlation between the calculated complexity scores and the extent of the dose differences (pass rate) are analyzed in scatter plots and using Pearson's r ‐values. Results: The complexity scores calculated by the edge area metric , converted aperture metric , circumference/area ratio, edge metric , and MU/Gy ratio show good linear correlation to the complexity of the MLC openings, expressed as the 5% dose difference pass rate, with Pearson's r ‐values of −0.94, −0.88, −0.84, −0.89, and −0.82, respectively. The overall trends for the 3% and 5% dose difference evaluations are similar. Conclusions: New complexity metrics are developed. The calculated scores correlate to the complexity of the created static MLC openings. The complexity of the MLC opening is dependent on the penumbra region relative to the area of the opening. The aperture‐based complexity metrics that combined either the distances between the MLC leaves or the MLC opening circumference with the aperture area show the best correlation with the complexity of the static MLC openings.