Premium
Dynamic trajectory‐based couch motion for improvement of radiation therapy trajectories in cranial SRT
Author(s) -
Lee MacDonald R.,
Thomas Christopher G.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4917165
Subject(s) - isocenter , imaging phantom , nuclear medicine , trajectory , dosimetry , radiation treatment planning , radiosurgery , radiation therapy , brain cancer , computer science , mathematics , medicine , physics , surgery , cancer , astronomy
Purpose: To investigate potential improvement in external beam stereotactic radiation therapy plan quality for cranial cases using an optimized dynamic gantry and patient support couch motion trajectory, which could minimize exposure to sensitive healthy tissue. Methods: Anonymized patient anatomy and treatment plans of cranial cancer patients were used to quantify the geometric overlap between planning target volumes and organs‐at‐risk (OARs) based on their two‐dimensional projection from source to a plane at isocenter as a function of gantry and couch angle. Published dose constraints were then used as weighting factors for the OARs to generate a map of couch‐gantry coordinate space, indicating degree of overlap at each point in space. A couch‐gantry collision space was generated by direct measurement on a linear accelerator and couch using an anthropomorphic solid‐water phantom. A dynamic, fully customizable algorithm was written to generate a navigable ideal trajectory for the patient specific couch‐gantry space. The advanced algorithm can be used to balance the implementation of absolute minimum values of overlap with the clinical practicality of large‐scale couch motion and delivery time. Optimized cranial cancer treatment trajectories were compared to conventional treatment trajectories. Results: Comparison of optimized treatment trajectories with conventional treatment trajectories indicated an average decrease in mean dose to the OARs of 19% and an average decrease in maximum dose to the OARs of 12%. Degradation was seen for homogeneity index (6.14% ± 0.67%–5.48% ± 0.76%) and conformation number (0.82 ± 0.02–0.79 ± 0.02), but neither was statistically significant. Removal of OAR constraints from volumetric modulated arc therapy optimization reveals that reduction in dose to OARs is almost exclusively due to the optimized trajectory and not the OAR constraints. Conclusions: The authors’ study indicated that simultaneous couch and gantry motion during radiation therapy to minimize the geometrical overlap in the beams‐eye‐view of target volumes and the organs‐at‐risk can have an appreciable dose reduction to organs‐at‐risk.