Premium
Few‐view cone‐beam CT reconstruction with deformed prior image
Author(s) -
Zhang Hua,
Ouyang Luo,
Huang Jing,
Ma Jianhua,
Chen Wufan,
Wang Jing
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4901265
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , cone beam computed tomography , artificial intelligence , computer vision , projection (relational algebra) , iterative reconstruction , image quality , computer science , image registration , medical imaging , matching (statistics) , image (mathematics) , cone beam ct , mathematics , nuclear medicine , computed tomography , medicine , algorithm , radiology , statistics
Purpose: Prior images can be incorporated into the image reconstruction process to improve the quality of subsequent cone‐beam CT (CBCT) images from sparse‐view or low‐dose projections. The purpose of this work is to develop a deformed prior image‐based reconstruction (DPIR) strategy to mitigate the deformation between the prior image and the target image. Methods: The deformed prior image is obtained by a projection‐based registration approach. Specifically, the deformation vector fields used to deform the prior image are estimated through iteratively matching the forward projection of the deformed prior image and the measured on‐treatment projections. The deformed prior image is then used as the prior image in the standard prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) algorithm. A simulation study on an XCAT phantom and a clinical study on a head‐and‐neck cancer patient were conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed DPIR strategy. Results: The deformed prior image matches the geometry of the on‐treatment CBCT more closely as compared to the original prior image. Consequently, the performance of the DPIR strategy from few‐view projections is improved in comparison to the standard PICCS algorithm, based on both visual inspection and quantitative measures. In the XCAT phantom study using 20 projections, the average root mean squared error is reduced from 14% in PICCS to 10% in DPIR, and the average universal quality index increases from 0.88 in PICCS to 0.92 in DPIR. Conclusions: The present DPIR approach provides a practical solution to the mismatch problem between the prior image and target image, which improves the performance of the original PICCS algorithm for CBCT reconstruction from few‐view or low‐dose projections.