z-logo
Premium
T 1‐weighted MR image contrast around a cryoablation iceball: A phantom study and initial comparison with in vivo findings
Author(s) -
Overduin Christiaan G.,
Bomers Joyce G. R.,
Jenniskens Sjoerd F. M.,
Hoes Maarten F.,
Haken Bennie,
Lange Frank,
Fütterer Jurgen J.,
Scheenen Tom W. J.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4896824
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , cryoablation , magnetic resonance imaging , nuclear medicine , materials science , in vivo , contrast (vision) , nuclear magnetic resonance , biomedical engineering , medicine , radiology , physics , optics , microbiology and biotechnology , ablation , biology
Purpose: To correlate T 1‐weighted ( T 1w) magnetic resonance (MR) image contrast around a cryoablation iceball with temperature in a phantom study and to compare this to its in vivo appearance during MR‐guided focal cryoablation of prostate cancer. Methods: A MR‐compatible cryoneedle was inserted into identical gel phantoms ( n = 3) on a 1.5 T MR system. Two fiber‐optic temperature sensors were placed parallel to the needle. A fast 3D T 1w gradient echo (GRE) sequence (TR/TE/FA = 4.81/1.98/6°) was used to monitor iceball progression. Normalized signal intensity (SI) was correlated with temperature. The same T 1w sequence was used during MR‐guided prostate cryoablation in ten consecutive patients at the authors’ institution. In vivo findings were quantitatively compared to the phantom data. Results: In the phantom study, the cryoablation iceball appeared in the T 1w MR images as a sharply delineated signal void. A 2.2 ± 0.2 mm wide hyperintense rim directly surrounded the iceball at cooled but nonfreezing temperatures (<20 °C) in the gel. Normalized SI was maximum at 8.4 ± 2.4 °C, showing a 35.6%–43.0% (mean 40.5%) increase with respect to baseline before cooling. In the clinical procedures, the same image contrast was observed in vivo in all patients. In vivo , width of the hyperintense rim was 1.6 ± 0.6 mm. Normalized SI increases with respect to nontreated prostate ranged 28.4%–55.6% (mean 36.8%). On quantitative analysis, normalized SI changes along a linear region of interest from surrounding tissue onto the iceball center were similar between the patients and phantom setting (root mean square difference 0.06). Conclusions: The hyperintense rim around the iceball in fast T 1w GRE images corresponded to cooled but nonfreezing temperatures (<20 °C) proximal to the frozen zone. The same image contrast was observed both in a phantom study as well as in vivo in the human prostate during cryotherapy. Potentially, monitoring of this rim could be useful in order to maintain a safe margin from at‐risk tissues during MR‐guided prostate cryoablation procedures.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom