Premium
SU‐F‐BRE‐07: Experimental Validation of a Lung SBRT Technique Using a Novel, True Volumetric Plenoptic‐Plastic‐Scintillator Detector
Author(s) -
Goulet M,
Rilling M,
Gingras L,
Beddar S,
Beaulieu L,
Archambault L
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4889045
Subject(s) - scintillator , pinnacle , detector , nuclear medicine , imaging phantom , radius , flat panel detector , optics , physics , scintillation , materials science , radiation treatment planning , biomedical engineering , medicine , computer science , radiology , radiation therapy , computer security
Purpose: Lung SBRT is being used by an increasing number of clinics, including our center which recently treated its first patient. In order to validate this technique, the 3D dose distribution of the SBRT plan was measured using a previously developed 3D detector based on plenoptic camera and plastic scintillator technology. The excellent agreement between the detector measurement and the expected dose from the treatment planning system Pinnacle 3 shows great promise and amply justify the development of the technique. Methods: The SBRT treatment comprised 8 non‐coplanar 6MV photon fields with a mean field size of 12 cm 2 at isocentre and a total prescription dose of 12Gy per fraction for a total of 48Gy. The 3D detector was composed of a 10×10×10 cm 2 EJ‐260 water‐equivalent plastic scintillator embedded inside a truncated cylindrical acrylic phantom of 10cm radius. The scintillation light was recorded using a static R5 light‐field camera and the 3D dose was reconstructed at a 2mm resolution in all 3 dimensions using an iterative backprojection algorithm. Results: The whole 3D dose distribution was recorded at a rate of one acquisition per second. The mean absolute dose difference between the detector and Pinnacle 3 was 1.3% over the region with more than 10% of the maximum dose. 3D gamma tests performed over the same region yield passing rates of 98.8% and 96.6% with criteria of 3%/1mm and 2%/1mm, respectively. Conclusion: Experimental results showed that our beam modeling and treatment planning system calculation was adequate for the safe administration of small field/high dose techniques such as SBRT. Moreover, because of the real‐time capability of the detector, further validation of small field rotational, dynamic or gated technique can be monitored or verified by this system.