Premium
SU‐E‐T‐64: CG‐Based Radiation Therapy Simulator with Physical Modeling for Avoidance of Collisions Between Gantry and Couch Or Patient
Author(s) -
Yamanouchi M,
Arimura H,
Yuda I
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4888394
Subject(s) - radiation therapy , simulation , dosimetry , radiation treatment planning , computer science , nuclear medicine , medicine , radiology
Purpose: It is time‐consuming and might cause re‐planning to check couch‐gantry and patient‐gantry collisions on a radiotherapy machine when using couch rotations for non‐coplanar beam angles. The aim of this study was to develop a computer‐graphics (CG)‐based radiation therapy simulator with physical modeling for avoidance of collisions between gantry and couch or patient on a radiotherapy machine. Methods: The radiation therapy simulator was three‐dimensionally constructed including a radiotherapy machine (Clinac iX, Varian Medical Systems), couch, and radiation treatment room according to their designs by using a physical‐modeling‐based computer graphics software (Blender, free and open‐source). Each patient was modeled by applying a surface rendering technique to their planning computed tomography (CT) images acquired from 16‐slice CT scanner (BrightSpeed, GE Healthcare). Immobilization devices for patients were scanned by the CT equipment, and were rendered as the patient planning CT images. The errors in the collision angle of the gantry with the couch or patient between gold standards and the estimated values were obtained by fixing the gantry angle for the evaluation of the proposed simulator. Results: The average error of estimated collision angles to the couch head side was ‐8.5% for gantry angles of 60 to 135 degree, and ‐5.5% for gantry angles of 225 to 300 degree. Moreover, the average error of estimated collision angles to the couch foot side was ‐1.1% for gantry angles of 60 to 135 degree, and 1.4% for gantry angles of 225 to 300 degree. Conclusion: The CG‐based radiation therapy simulator could make it possible to estimate the collision angle between gantry and couch or patient on the radiotherapy machine without verifying the collision angles in the radiation treatment room.