z-logo
Premium
SU‐E‐I‐69: How to Appropriately Calculate Effective Dose for CT Using Either SSDE Or DLP
Author(s) -
Brady S,
Mirro A,
Moore B,
Kaufman R
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4888019
Subject(s) - imaging phantom , nuclear medicine , medicine , weighting , effective dose (radiation) , population , dosimetry , radiology , environmental health
Purpose: To demonstrate how to calculate effective dose (E) using specific dose estimates (SSDE), and to correct the current method using CT dose length product (DLP). Methods: The institutional review board waived the need to obtain informed consent for this analysis. Data were analyzed from 352 chest and 241 abdominopelvic CT images (mean age 6.2 years ± 5.1; range 5–55 kg). To calculate E using SSDE, SSDE was first calculated for chest and abdominopelvic regions. 23 individual organ dose values were estimated using the patient's weight and effective diameter to look up a conversion factor that was multiplied by patient SSDE. Organ doses were averaged within patient weight‐based populations, and used to calculate E by the method of weighted summation of organ dose with ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors (E_ICRP). E was calculated using population averaged CT examination DLP for the chest and abdominopelvic region using k‐coefficients published in AAPM Report 96 (E_DLP). Results: E_DLP was different by an average of 21% (1.4/1.1) in the chest and 42% (2.4/3.4) in the abdominopelvic region as compared to calculating E_ICRP. K‐coefficients published in AAPM Report 96 did not account for pitch factor other than unity, were derived using a 32 cm diameter CTDI phantom only, and used ICRP 60 tissue weighting factors. Once corrected for pitch factor, the appropriate size of CTDI phantom, and ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors, E_DLP improved in agreement with E_ICRP to better than 7% (1.4/1.3) and 4% (2.4/2.5) for the chest and abdominopelvic regions, respectively. Conclusion: Current use of DLP to calculate E was shown to be deficient when compared to the method using ICRP tissue weighting factors due to the outdated means by which the k‐coefficients were derived. This study demonstrates a means to calculate E_ICRP using patient SSDE and how to appropriately correct E_DLP.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom