Premium
Erratum: “Resolution modeling enhances PET imaging” [Med. Phys. 40, 120601 (2013)]
Author(s) -
Alessio Adam M.,
Rahmim Arman,
Orton Colin G.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4886898
Subject(s) - counterpoint , sentence , noise (video) , variation (astronomy) , implementation , computer science , point (geometry) , algorithm , mathematics , artificial intelligence , physics , image (mathematics) , programming language , geometry , acoustics , astrophysics
Due to a misunderstanding, the references in the following sentence of the original paper1 were incorrectly numbered: “What my esteemed colleague refers to as true noise [i.e., σ ensemble, or the coefficient-of-variation (COV) when expressed as a percentage] may change little with RM,2 or instead be amplified twofold4 or even more6 in small ROIs for some RM implementations.” The sentence should have read: “What my esteemed colleague refers to as true noise [i.e., σ ensemble, or the coefficient-of-variation (COV) when expressed as a percentage] may change little with RM,6 or instead be amplified twofold10 or even more12 in small ROIs for some RM implementations.” The citations refer to the bibliography in the published point/counterpoint paper. 1A. M. Alessio, A. Rahmim, and C. G. Orton, “Resolution modeling enhances PET imaging,” Med. Phys. 40, 120601 (4pp.) (2013).