z-logo
Premium
DCE‐MRI defined subvolumes of a brain metastatic lesion by principle component analysis and fuzzy‐c‐means clustering for response assessment of radiation therapy
Author(s) -
Farjam Reza,
Tsien Christina I.,
Lawrence Theodore S.,
Cao Yue
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4842556
Subject(s) - voxel , principal component analysis , nuclear medicine , projection (relational algebra) , magnetic resonance imaging , radiation therapy , dicom , receiver operating characteristic , medicine , computer science , cluster analysis , radiology , artificial intelligence , algorithm
Purpose: To develop a pharmacokinetic modelfree framework to analyze the dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) data for assessment of response of brain metastases to radiation therapy.Methods: Twenty patients with 45 analyzable brain metastases had MRI scans prior to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and at the end of the 2‐week therapy. The volumetric DCE images covering the whole brain were acquired on a 3T scanner with approximately 5 s temporal resolution and a total scan time of about 3 min. DCE curves from all voxels of the 45 brain metastases were normalized and then temporally aligned. A DCE matrix that is constructed from the aligned DCE curves of all voxels of the 45 lesions obtained prior to WBRT is processed by principal component analysis to generate the principal components (PCs). Then, the projection coefficient maps prior to and at the end of WBRT are created for each lesion. Next, a pattern recognition technique, based upon fuzzy‐c‐means clustering, is used to delineate the tumor subvolumes relating to the value of the significant projection coefficients. The relationship between changes in different tumor subvolumes and treatment response was evaluated to differentiate responsive from stable and progressive tumors. Performance of the PC‐defined tumor subvolume was also evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis in prediction of nonresponsive lesions and compared with physiological‐defined tumor subvolumes.Results: The projection coefficient maps of the first three PCs contain almost all response‐related information in DCE curves of brain metastases. The first projection coefficient, related to the area under DCE curves, is the major component to determine response while the third one has a complimentary role. In ROC analysis, the area under curve of 0.88 ± 0.05 and 0.86 ± 0.06 were achieved for the PC‐defined and physiological‐defined tumor subvolume in response assessment.Conclusions: The PC‐defined subvolume of a brain metastasis could predict tumor response to therapy similar to the physiological‐defined one, while the former is determined more rapidly for clinical decision‐making support.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here