z-logo
Premium
Computerized detection of breast cancer on automated breast ultrasound imaging of women with dense breasts
Author(s) -
Drukker Karen,
Sennett Charlene A.,
Giger Maryellen L.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4837196
Subject(s) - breast cancer , medicine , mammography , ultrasound , asymptomatic , breast ultrasound , breast imaging , radiology , cancer , breast density , cancer detection , nuclear medicine , medical physics
Purpose: Develop a computer‐aided detection method and investigate its feasibility for detection of breast cancer in automated 3D ultrasound images of women with dense breasts.Methods: The HIPAA compliant study involved a dataset of volumetric ultrasound image data, “views,” acquired with an automated U‐Systems Somo•V ® ABUS system for 185 asymptomatic women with dense breasts (BI‐RADS Composition/Density 3 or 4). For each patient, three whole‐breast views (3D image volumes) per breast were acquired. A total of 52 patients had breast cancer (61 cancers), diagnosed through any follow‐up at most 365 days after the original screening mammogram. Thirty‐one of these patients (32 cancers) had a screening‐mammogram with a clinically assigned BI‐RADS Assessment Category 1 or 2, i.e., were mammographically negative. All software used for analysis was developed in‐house and involved 3 steps: (1) detection of initial tumor candidates, (2) characterization of candidates, and (3) elimination of false‐positive candidates. Performance was assessed by calculating the cancer detection sensitivity as a function of the number of “marks” (detections) per view.Results: At a single mark per view, i.e., six marks per patient, the median detection sensitivity by cancer was 50.0% (16/32) ± 6% for patients with a screening mammogram‐assigned BI‐RADS category 1 or 2—similar to radiologists’ performance sensitivity (49.9%) for this dataset from a prior reader study—and 45.9% (28/61) ± 4% for all patients.Conclusions: Promising detection sensitivity was obtained for the computer on a 3D ultrasound dataset of women with dense breasts at a rate of false‐positive detections that may be acceptable for clinical implementation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom