z-logo
Premium
SU‐E‐T‐84: Characterization of a Three‐Dimensional Radiochromic Film Stack Dosimeter for Measurements of 6 MV Photon Beams
Author(s) -
McCaw T,
Micka J,
DeWerd L
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4814519
Subject(s) - dosimeter , imaging phantom , materials science , monte carlo method , optics , photon , stack (abstract data type) , absorbed dose , photon energy , thermoluminescent dosimeter , percentage depth dose curve , dosimetry , physics , ionization chamber , radiation , nuclear medicine , ionization , medicine , statistics , mathematics , computer science , programming language , ion , quantum mechanics
Purpose: To investigate the energy response, orientation dependence, and water equivalence of a novel three‐dimensional radiochromic film stack dosimeter (FSD) and verify its accuracy for measurements of 6 MV photon beams. Methods: The FSD consists of 22 films, 3.8 cm in diameter, separated by 1 mm‐thick water‐equivalent‐plastic spacers. A model of the FSD was created using MCNP5. The photon energy spectrum through each film in the FSD from a 6 MV photon source was simulated to ascertain any changes that would produce an energy‐dependent response. The absorbed dose within the FSD was simulated for incident beam angles of 0° to 90° relative to the axis normal to the film plane to investigate the orientation dependence of the dosimeter. To determine the water equivalence of the FSD, the percent‐depth‐dose (PDD) profile within a cylindrical water phantom was simulated and compared with PDD measurements with the FSD within a cylindrical, water‐equivalent‐plastic phantom. Separate exposures of the FSD were performed with a 6 MV slit field incident normal and parallel to the film plane. The results of these exposures were compared with TLD microcube measurements to verify the accuracy of the FSD. Results: Variations in the photon energy spectrum throughout the FSD are minimal, producing an absorbed‐dose energy response of less than 0.1%. The absorbed dose within the FSD varies less than 1.5% as a function of incident beam angle. PDD measurements with the FSD agree with Monte Carlo simulations within 2%. Differences between FSD and TLD measurements within the slit field are less than the respective expanded overall measurement uncertainties of 2.5% and 5.2%. The FSD and TLD measurements agree within 0.5 mm in the field penumbra. Conclusion: For 6 MV photons, the FSD is energy independent, orientation independent, and water equivalent within 2%, and has been verified for three‐dimensional dosimetry.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom