Premium
A novel dose‐based positioning method for CT image‐guided proton therapy
Author(s) -
Cheung Joey P.,
Park Peter C.,
Court Laurence E.,
Ronald Zhu X.,
Kudchadker Rajat J.,
Frank Steven J.,
Dong Lei
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4801910
Subject(s) - isocenter , proton therapy , dosimetry , nuclear medicine , image guided radiation therapy , medical imaging , radiation therapy , medicine , radiation treatment planning , medical physics , radiology
Purpose: Proton dose distributions can potentially be altered by anatomical changes in the beam path despite perfect target alignment using traditional image guidance methods. In this simulation study, the authors explored the use of dosimetric factors instead of only anatomy to set up patients for proton therapy using in‐room volumetric computed tomographic (CT) images.Methods: To simulate patient anatomy in a free‐breathing treatment condition, weekly time‐averaged four‐dimensional CT data near the end of treatment for 15 lung cancer patients were used in this study for a dose‐based isocenter shift method to correct dosimetric deviations without replanning. The isocenter shift was obtained using the traditional anatomy‐based image guidance method as the starting position. Subsequent isocenter shifts were established based on dosimetric criteria using a fast dose approximation method. For each isocenter shift, doses were calculated every 2 mm up to ±8 mm in each direction. The optimal dose alignment was obtained by imposing a target coverage constraint that at least 99% of the target would receive at least 95% of the prescribed dose and by minimizing the mean dose to the ipsilateral lung.Results: The authors found that 7 of 15 plans did not meet the target coverage constraint when using only the anatomy‐based alignment. After the authors applied dose‐based alignment, all met the target coverage constraint. For all but one case in which the target dose was met using both anatomy‐based and dose‐based alignment, the latter method was able to improve normal tissue sparing.Conclusions: The authors demonstrated that a dose‐based adjustment to the isocenter can improve target coverage and/or reduce dose to nearby normal tissue.