Premium
Comprehensive assessment of the slice sensitivity profiles in breast tomosynthesis and breast CT
Author(s) -
Nosratieh Anita,
Yang Kai,
AminololamaShakeri Shadi,
Boone John M.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4764908
Subject(s) - tomosynthesis , scanner , angular resolution (graph drawing) , optics , image resolution , physics , nuclear medicine , breast imaging , projection (relational algebra) , mammography , mathematics , medicine , algorithm , cancer , combinatorics , breast cancer
Purpose: This study experimentally evaluated the slice sensitivity profile (SSP) and its relationship between acquisition angle, object size, and cone angle. The sensitivity profile metric was used to characterize a breast tomosynthesis systemˈs resolution in the z‐axis. The SSP was also measured on a prototype breast computed tomography (bCT) system. Methods: The SSP was measured using brass disks placed within adipose tissue‐equivalent breast phantoms. The digital tomosynthesis system (Selenia Dimensions, Hologic Corporation, Bedford, MA) acquires projection images over a 15° angular range and the bCT scanner acquires projection images over a 360° angular range. Angular ranges between 15° and 360° were studied by using a subset of the projection images acquired on the bCT scanner. The SSP was determined by measuring a background‐corrected mean gray scale value as a function of the z‐position (axis normal to the plane of the detector). Results: The results show that SSP improves when the angular acquisition range is increased and the SSP approaches a delta function for angles greater than 180°. Smaller objects have a narrower SSP and the SSP is not significantly dependent on the cone angle. For a 2.5, 5, 10 mm disk, the full width at half maximum of the SSP was 35, 61, 115 mm, respectively, on the tomosynthesis system (at 15°) and was 0.5 mm for all disk diameters on the bCT scanner (at 360°). Conclusions: The SSP is dependent on object size and angular acquisition range. These dependencies are overcome once the angular acquisition range is increased beyond 180°.