Premium
Sci—Fri AM: Imaging — 08: Comparison of single and dual layer detector blocks for pre‐clinical MRI‐PET
Author(s) -
Thompson C,
Stortz G,
Goertzen A,
Berg E,
Retière F,
Kozlowski P,
Ryner L,
Sossi V
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4740194
Subject(s) - lyso , dual layer , scanner , materials science , detector , crystal (programming language) , nuclear medicine , optics , block (permutation group theory) , layer (electronics) , physics , computer science , medicine , scintillator , geometry , mathematics , composite material , programming language
Our group is developing a small animal PET scanner which would fit in a 7 Tesla MRI scanner to provide simultaneous PET and MR acquisitions and images. There is very little room for the PET detectors and we must use nonmagnetic materials. This presentation describes preliminary work with two PET detectors consisting of LYSO blocks each with two crystal layers: 49 1.67*1.67*6.0 mm on the bottom layer and 36 4.0 mm deep crystals on the top layer. These are mounted on SensL 4*4 arrays of silicon photo‐multipliers whose outputs are multiplexed to provide three signals: Energy, X, Y. These detectors were mounted on translation stages and scanned past a 0.25 mm diameter 370 MBq Na‐18 source embedded in tissue equivalent plastic. The results were compared with similar single layer crystal blocks with 10 mm deep crystals to assess the advantage of dual layer crystals to reduce radial blurring in a PET scanner with a diameter of only 64 mm. The ability to identify correctly each crystal is reported as its resolvability index, (RI), defined as the (crystal response FWHM)/(crystal's separation) in the crystal identification matrix. For the dual layer block RI =0.44, and for dual layer block RI=0.22. The coincidence response resolution for the single layer block varied from 1.23±0.05 mm at the centre of the scanner to 3.09±0.10 mm at 15.8 mm radius, while the dual layer block varied from 1.31±0.06 to 1.96±0.51 mm over the same range, confirming the Monte‐Carlo simulations showing reduced radial blurring.