Premium
Poster — Thur Eve — 76: A quality control to achieve planning consistency in arc radiotherapy of the prostate
Author(s) -
Zeng G,
Murphy J,
Annis SL,
Wu X,
Wang Y,
McGowan T,
Macpherson M
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4740185
Subject(s) - radiation treatment planning , medical physics , eclipse , medicine , prostatectomy , software , computer science , radiation therapy , prostate , prostate cancer , dosimetry , nuclear medicine , population , rectum , surgery , cancer , operating system , physics , environmental health , astronomy
Purpose: To report a quality control program in prostate radiation therapy at our center that includes semi‐automated planning process to generate high quality plans and in‐house software to track plan quality in the subsequent clinical application. Material and methods: Arc planning in Eclipse v10.0 was preformed for both intact prostate and post‐prostatectomy treatments. The planning focuses on DVH requirements and dose distributions being able to tolerate daily setup variations. A modified structure set is used to standardize the optimization, including short rectum and bladder in the fields to effectively tighten dose to target and a rectum expansion with 1cm cropped from PTV to block dose and shape posterior isodose lines. Structure, plan and optimization templates are used to streamline plan generation. DVH files are exported from Eclipse to a quality tracking software with GUI written in Matlab that can report the dose‐volume data either for an individual patient or over a patient population. Results: For 100 intact prostate patients treated with 78Gy, rectal D50, D25, D15 and D5 are 30.1±6.2Gy, 50.6±7.9Gy, 65.9±6.0Gy and 76.6±1.4Gy respectively, well below the limits 50Gy, 65Gy, 75Gy and 78Gy respectively. For prostate bed with prescription of 66Gy, rectal D50 is 35.9±6.9Gy. In both sites, PTV is covered by 95% prescription and the hotspots are less than 5%. Conclusion: The semi‐automated planning method can efficiently create high quality plans while the tracking software can monitor the feedback from clinical application. It is a comprehensive and robust quality control program in radiation therapy.