Premium
Integrated multicriterial optimization of beam angles and intensity profiles for coplanar and noncoplanar head and neck IMRT and implications for VMAT
Author(s) -
Voet Peter W. J.,
Breedveld Sebastiaan,
Dirkx Maarten L. P.,
Levendag Peter C.,
Heijmen Ben J. M.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4736803
Subject(s) - beam (structure) , head and neck , intensity (physics) , nuclear medicine , head and neck cancer , rotation (mathematics) , optics , radiation therapy , computer science , medicine , physics , radiology , artificial intelligence , surgery
Purpose: To quantify improved salivary gland sparing for head and neck cancer patients using intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans based on integrated computerized optimization of beam orientations and intensity profiles. To assess if optimized nonzero couch angles also improve VMAT plans. Methods: Our in‐house developed algorithm iCycle was used for automated generation of multicriterial optimized plans with optimized beam orientations and intensity profiles, and plans with optimized profiles for preselected beam arrangements. For 20 patients, five IMRT plans, based on one “wish‐list,” were compared: (i) and (ii) seven‐ and nine‐beam equiangular coplanar plans (iCycle 7equi , iCycle 9equi ), (iii) and (iv) nine‐beam plans with optimized coplanar and noncoplanar beam orientations (iCycle copl , iCycle noncopl ), and (v) a nine‐beam coplanar plan with optimized gantry angles and one optimized couch rotation (iCycle couch ). VMAT plans without and with this optimized couch rotation were evaluated. Results: iCycle noncopl resulted in the best salivary gland sparing, while iCycle couch yielded similar results for 18 patients. For iCycle 7equi , submandibular gland NTCP values were on average 5% higher. iCycle 9equi performed better than iCycle 7equi . iCycle copl showed further improvement. Application of the optimized couch angle from iCycle couch also improved NTCP values in VMAT plans. Conclusions: iCycle allows objective comparison of competing planning strategies. Integrated optimization of beam profiles and angles can significantly improve normal tissue sparing, yielding optimal results for iCycle noncopl .