z-logo
Premium
SU‐E‐T‐537: Photon Beam Modeling and Verification of Collapsed Cone Convolution Algorithm for Dose Calculation in a Radiation Treatment Planning System
Author(s) -
Jung J,
Cho W,
Lee J,
Kim D,
Kim M,
Suh T
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4735626
Subject(s) - convolution (computer science) , beam (structure) , radiation treatment planning , linear particle accelerator , dosimetry , percentage depth dose curve , wedge (geometry) , physics , optics , photon , radiation , nuclear medicine , field size , ionization chamber , radiation therapy , computer science , medicine , ionization , quantum mechanics , machine learning , artificial neural network , ion
Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy the collapsed cone convolution (CCC) algorithm for dose calculation in a radiation treatment planning system (TPS). Methods: We modeled various photon beams for various setup conditions in a radiation treatment planning system (CorePLANTM, Seoul C&J, Korea). The beam models were generated at various set‐up conditions such as open beam or wedged beam, 6 MV or 15 MV beam and field sizes from 4×4 cm 2 to 40 × 40 cm 2 . Each beam model was optimized by spectrum modeling from measured percent depth dose (PDD) data, dose profile modeling from a measured profile at a specific depth (10 cm) data. Dose calculation was performed using conventional CCC algorithm. All measured data were acquired from a Clinac 21EX (Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA, USA) linear accelerator with the setting of SSD = 100 cm. All calculated PDD and dose profiles at various depths from generated beam models were compared to the measured data. Results: Calculated dose data from each beam model showed good agreements within 2% of difference to the measured PDD and within 3% dose profiles at various depths. Some regions such as penumbra region at 20 × 20 cm 2 field size and horn region at wedge field showed dose discrepancies over 3%. The results of PDD at all situations showed well agreement with measured data under the 10×10 cm 2 field size. For wedged cases, however, under the 5 cm depths, some inconsistency at penumbra region were appeared. Conclusions: In this study, we verified the accuracy of CCC algorithm in the TPS. Calculated results by our implemented algorithm was well satisfied with measured dose at small field size (〈20 7 times; 20 cm 2 ). Our next study will perform to compensate theses inconsistencies.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom