Premium
SU‐E‐T‐390: Monitorization of the Dynamic Multi‐Leaf Collimator Performance Using Log Files ‐ a Quality Assurance Tool for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
Author(s) -
Silva A Martins da,
Pereira A,
Barreiros M,
Silva R,
Faria D
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4735479
Subject(s) - collimator , quality assurance , bin , mathematics , root mean square , standard deviation , dosimetry , nuclear medicine , mean squared error , mean difference , statistics , intensity (physics) , optics , medicine , algorithm , physics , confidence interval , external quality assessment , pathology , quantum mechanics
Purpose : Commission baseline values of the multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) using Varian's dynalog file viewer software (DFV) and establish tolerance levels to use as a periodic quality assurance tool in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods : A sliding window test was created to have all leafs moving at a constant high speed of 2.5cm/s. This test was performed for 100 days at gantry angles of 0°, 90° and 270° during the morning quality checks in an accelerator performing RapidArc treatments with a Millennium 120 MLC. The DFV was used to collect the percentage of counts in bins 1 (0.05mm) to 8 (deviations in steps of 0.5mm) and the root mean square error (RMS). These were analyzed statistically and a baseline value and tolerance levels were established. Results : Results show that the greater percentage of counts is found at bin 4 with an average of 97%. Bins 1 to 3 have less than 1 % and bin 5 presents an average of 1.7%. As for bin 6, the average was below 0.1%. Bins 7 and 8 presented no counts. When comparing the results of the different gantry angles, significant differences are only found in bin 4 and 5, with a better performance for the 0° gantry. As for the RMS error, no difference was found between different carriages or gantry angles and the average value was 0.129. A tolerance level was established for bins that correspond to greater deviations ‐ bins 5 to 8, with an upper limit equivalent to twice the standard deviation of each bin. Conclusions : With the introduction of IMRT, the MLC quality assurance became more extensive and thorough. However a quantitative analysis is often difficult to interpret and time consuming. The purposed method allows the monitorization of the stability and performance of the MLC in a quantitative and easy way.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom