Premium
SU‐E‐T‐347: Evaluation of DQA Results Using a Super‐Sampling Dose Calculation in Helical Tomotherapy
Author(s) -
Rupolo R,
Wang S,
Xu Z,
Deschesne K,
Chang S,
Lian J
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4735434
Subject(s) - tomotherapy , quality assurance , sampling (signal processing) , nuclear medicine , radiation treatment planning , dosimetry , projection (relational algebra) , mathematics , algorithm , medical physics , computer science , detector , medicine , radiation therapy , physics , optics , radiology , external quality assessment , pathology
Purpose: The aim of this work is to evaluate the impact of a new supersampling dose calculation method on delivery quality assurance (DQA) results for helical tomotherapy patient plans. Methods: Accuray's Tomotherapy treatment planning system performs its dose calculation by approximating the continuous beam of a full gantry rotation into 51 discrete beam projections, with one dose calculation per projection (TomoHD version 1.0). In a recent software release, TomoHD version 1.1, Accuray enhanced this technique by employing three dose calculation samples per projection. This ‘super‐sampling’ methodology is meant to improve agreement between measured and calculated dose. For this study, we compare the results of the 24 patient DQA plans calculated in our clinic with the newer version of dose calculation with the previous 24 patient plans which were calculated with the older method. The plans were delivered to a SunNuclear ArcCHECK cylindrical detector array, and data were compared using a γ evaluation, with criteria of 3%/3mm. To quantify the results, the percentage of points with γ 95%. Results: 21 of 24 DQA plans (87%) calculated with the older TomoHD 1.0 algorithm passed our (Pγ 95% criteria, while all 24 DQA Plans (100%) generated with the TomoHD 1.1 super‐sampling dose calculation passed. The average values for (Pγ