z-logo
Premium
SU‐E‐T‐66: A Particle‐Counting Method to Determine Electron Stopping Powers
Author(s) -
McEwen M,
DuSautoy A,
Bass G
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4735122
Subject(s) - detector , electron , range (aeronautics) , full width at half maximum , stopping power , physics , semiconductor detector , linear particle accelerator , dosimetry , atomic number , nuclear physics , atomic physics , optics , materials science , nuclear medicine , beam (structure) , medicine , composite material
Purpose: To evaluate a particle‐counting method to experimentally determine electron stopping powers for application in primary standards and dosimetry protocols for megavoltage reference dosimetryMethod andMaterials:An electron linear accelerator was modified to operate in single‐electron‐per‐pulse operation (i.e., on average, less than one electron per rfpulse). A HPGe detector system was then used to measure the energy of electrons emerging from the accelerator. Thin plates of absorbing material (< 0.5 gcm‐2) were then placed between the exit window and detector andthe emerging electron spectrum was re‐acquired. Initial measurements were made at two energies of 4 MeV and 6 MeV with two different absorbing materials ‐ aluminum and graphite. Up to eight thicknesses of absorber were used for aluminum and four or five for graphite. Results: The electron spectrum emerging from the accelerator was found to have a FWHM of around 70‐100 keV and the detector repeatability in measuring the peak wasaround 5 keV. A peak‐fitting routine was used to determine the peak energy, E, and FWHM of the electron spectrum for each thickness, t, of absorber and thus determine the parameter dE/dt, which is related to the electron stopping power. The standard uncertainty in the determination of dE/dt was in the range 1% to 1.7%. The large uncertainty was due to the limited number of data points, a coarse MCA and low count totals (limited acquisition time and low detector efficiency). Conclusion: The initial measurements demonstrated the possibilities of the approach but highlighted a number of deficiencies in the equipment. A new HPGe system is being commissioned with an optimized detector geometry and high‐resolutionMCA. Combined with increased runtimes it should be possible to determine dE/dt with necessary uncertainty level (< 0.5%) for comparison withcalculated stopping powers.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom