Premium
Automated measurement of uptake in cerebellum, liver, and aortic arch in full‐body FDG PET/CT scans
Author(s) -
Bauer Christian,
Sun Shanhui,
Sun Wenqing,
Otis Justin,
Wallace Audrey,
Smith Brian J.,
Sunderland John J.,
Graham Michael M.,
Sonka Milan,
Buatti John M.,
Beichel Reinhard R.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.4711815
Subject(s) - nuclear medicine , normalization (sociology) , segmentation , aortic arch , aorta , positron emission tomography , context (archaeology) , standardized uptake value , computed tomography , medicine , radiology , computer science , artificial intelligence , paleontology , sociology , anthropology , cardiology , biology
Purpose: The purpose of this work was to develop and validate fully automated methods for uptake measurement of cerebellum, liver, and aortic arch in full‐body PET/CT scans. Such measurements are of interest in the context of uptake normalization for quantitative assessment of metabolic activity and/or automated image quality control.Methods: Cerebellum, liver, and aortic arch regions were segmented with different automated approaches. Cerebella were segmented in PET volumes by means of a robust active shape model (ASM) based method. For liver segmentation, a largest possible hyperellipsoid was fitted to the liver in PET scans. The aortic arch was first segmented in CT images of a PET/CT scan by a tubular structure analysis approach, and the segmented result was then mapped to the corresponding PET scan. For each of the segmented structures, the average standardized uptake value (SUV) was calculated. To generate an independent reference standard for method validation, expert image analysts were asked to segment several cross sections of each of the three structures in 134 F‐18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT scans. For each case, the true average SUV was estimated by utilizing statistical models and served as the independent reference standard.Results: For automated aorta and liver SUV measurements, no statistically significant scale or shift differences were observed between automated results and the independent standard. In the case of the cerebellum, the scale and shift were not significantly different, if measured in the same cross sections that were utilized for generating the reference. In contrast, automated results were scaled 5% lower on average although not shifted, if FDG uptake was calculated from the whole segmented cerebellum volume. The estimated reduction in total SUV measurement error ranged between 54.7% and 99.2%, and the reduction was found to be statistically significant for cerebellum and aortic arch.Conclusions: With the proposed methods, the authors have demonstrated that automated SUV uptake measurements in cerebellum, liver, and aortic arch agree with expert‐defined independent standards. The proposed methods were found to be accurate and showed less intra‐ and interobserver variability, compared to manual analysis. The approach provides an alternative to manual uptake quantification, which is time‐consuming. Such an approach will be important for application of quantitative PET imaging to large scale clinical trials.