Premium
Dosimetric investigation of breath‐hold intensity‐modulated radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer
Author(s) -
Nakamura Mitsuhiro,
Kishimoto Shun,
Iwamura Kohei,
Shiinoki Takehiro,
Nakamura Akira,
Matsuo Yukinori,
Shibuya Keiko,
Hiraoka Masahiro
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3668314
Subject(s) - ionization chamber , isocenter , imaging phantom , multileaf collimator , nuclear medicine , linear particle accelerator , dosimetry , radiation therapy , materials science , beam (structure) , physics , optics , medicine , ionization , radiology , ion , quantum mechanics
Purpose: To experimentally investigate the effects of variations in respiratory motion during breath‐holding (BH) at end‐exhalation (EE) on intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (BH–IMRT) dose distribution using a motor‐driven base, films, and an ionization chamber. Methods: Measurements were performed on a linear accelerator, which has a 120‐leaf independently moving multileaf collimator with 5‐mm leaf width at the isocenter for the 20‐cm central field. Polystyrene phantoms with dimensions of 40 × 40 × 10 cm were set on a motor‐driven base. All gantry angles of seven IMRT plans (a total of 35 fields) were changed to zero, and doses were then delivered to a film placed at a depth of 4 cm and an ionization chamber at a depth of 5 cm in the phantom with a dose rate of 600 MU/min under the following conditions: pulsation from the abdominal aorta and baseline drift with speeds of 0.2 mm/s (BD 0.2mm/s ) and 0.4 mm/s (BD 0.4mm/s ). As a reference for comparison, doses were also delivered to the chamber and film under stationary conditions. Results: In chamber measurements, means ± standard deviations of the dose deviations between stationary and moving conditions were −0.52% ± 1.03% (range: −3.41–1.05%), −0.07% ± 1.21% (range: −1.88–4.31%), and 0.03% ± 1.70% (range: −2.70–6.41%) for pulsation, BD 0.2mm/s , and BD 0.4mm/s , respectively. The γ passing rate ranged from 99.5% to 100.0%, even with the criterion of 2%/1 mm for pulsation pattern. In the case of BD 0.4mm/s , the γ passing rate for four of 35 fields (11.4%) did not reach 90% with a criterion of 3%/3 mm. The differences in γ passing rate between BD 0.2mm/s and BD 0.4mm/s were statistically significant for each criterion. Taking γ passing rates of > 90% as acceptable with a criterion of 3%/3 mm, large differences were observed in the γ passing rate between the baseline drift of ≤5 mm and that of >5 mm (minimum γ passing rate: 92.0% vs 82.7%; p < 0.01). Conclusions: This study suggested that the baseline drift of >5 mm should be avoided in the BH–IMRT.