Premium
Characterization of an x‐ray phase contrast imaging system based on the miniature synchrotron MIRRORCLE‐6X
Author(s) -
Heekeren Joop,
Kostenko Alexander,
Hanashima Takayasu,
Yamada Hironari,
Stallinga Sjoerd,
Offerman S. Erik,
Vliet Lucas J.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
medical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.473
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 2473-4209
pISSN - 0094-2405
DOI - 10.1118/1.3622606
Subject(s) - x ray phase contrast imaging , phase contrast imaging , synchrotron radiation , synchrotron , optics , phase (matter) , monte carlo method , materials science , absorption (acoustics) , beamline , contrast (vision) , beam (structure) , physics , phase contrast microscopy , mathematics , quantum mechanics , statistics
Purpose: The implementation of in‐line x‐ray phase contrast imaging ( PCI ) for soft‐tissue patient imaging is hampered by the lack of a bright and spatially coherent x‐ray source that fits into the hospital environment. This article provides a quantitative characterization of the phase‐contrast enhancement of a PCI system based on the miniature synchrotron technology MIRRORCLE‐6X. Methods: The phase‐contrast effect was measured using an edge response of a plexiglass plate as a function of the incident angle of radiation. We have developed a comprehensive x‐ray propagation model based on the system's components, properties, and geometry in order to interpret the measurement data. Monte‐Carlo simulations are used to estimate the system's spectral properties and resolution. Results: The measured ratio of the detected phase‐contrast to the absorption contrast is currently in the range 100% to 200%. Experiments show that with the current implementation of the MIRRORCLE‐6X, a target smaller than 30–40 μm does not lead to a larger phase‐contrast. The reason for this is that the fraction of x‐rays produced by the material (carbon filament and glue) that is used for mounting the target in the electron beam is more than 25% of the total amount of x‐rays produced. This increases the apparent source size. The measured phase‐contrast is at maximum two times larger than the absorption contrast with the current set‐up. Conclusions: Calculations based on our model of the present imaging system predict that the phase‐contrast can be up to an order of magnitude larger than the absorption contrast in case the materials used for mounting the target in the electron beam do not (or hardly) produce x‐rays. The methods described in this paper provide vital feedback for guiding future modifications to the design of the x‐ray target of MIRRORCLE‐type system and configuration of the in‐line PCI systems in general.